![]() |
The Golden Age of the Music Store is Dead |
I've Seen the Death of Physical Media and It's the Wrong Thing Audiophiles are Trying to Resurrect
Tisbury Audio Releases New Mini Passive Preamplifier
Relative new-comer and British hifi-maker, Tisbury Audio, has released a major redesign of its popular Mini Passive Preamplifier. Tilbury Audio's passive preamp seems to have garnered some positive press for what the company says is "high end sound quality at a budget price."
In contrast to the previous model, the Mini Passive Preamp has a polished new look, lower price tag and a few new features. The enclosure is laser engraved walnut and aluminum. There is a stepped attenuator volume control, three inputs, two configurable outputs, and selectable fixed attenuation, which can serve as an adaptable control center for any audio system.
"A passive preamplifier differs from its 'active' counterparts by having no power supply and no active components," says Wes Young of Tisbury Audio. "Fundamentally, it is a high quality volume control and switches in a box, so it's about as close to audibly transparent as you can get."

Tisbury Audio was founded in 2012 and is a small boutique shop that hand-makes all of its products in London. As you'd therefore expect, the Mini Passive Preamp is proudly handmade in London from primarily British sourced parts. It comes with a 1 year warranty and a 14 day trial period. The Mini Passive Preamp is available immediately for £129 (approx. $200), direct from Tisbury Audio at tisburyaudio.co.uk
NuPrime launches IDA-8 Integrated Amplifier with New Class A + D Hybrid Amplifier and Built-in DAC
|
The big news in this integrated amplifier lies in its touted hybrid design and nod to modern digital sources. NuPrime claims that by utilizing discrete components in the Ultra-Linear Class A Module (ULCAM) circuit, the signal can be fine tuned to reduce noise and provide maximum power. NuPrime goes on to say that the amp circuit improves on traditional class-D design by using a self-oscillating circuit to generate pulse-width modulation. The amplifier switches at a frequency of 600kHz. NuPrime makes is a point to emphasize that the switching frequency is double that of most Class-D amps, which switch at 300kHz or lower, and is well beyond the compact disc’s 44.1kHz sampling rate. NuPrime’s SRC IC chip is said to provide FPGA processing for ultra-low jitter and distortion rates. It's not often that a company specifically points out the products' isolation feet. NuPrime has put some patent pending focus on the isolation feet by adding some patent pending feet that the company claims absorbs and cancels vibrations that degrade audio performance. In other words, there's no need to add after-market sorbothane feet or other dampening products to the new IDA-8. NuPrime further credits the IDA-8’s low noise floor to an innovative volume control based on a thin-film resistor design that positions a single resistor in the signal path for each volume setting. Volume changes occur in 99 precise 0.5dB increments for each input’s individually adjustable volume level. Precise level matching is a breeze, as is the user’s ability to make comparisons of music sources. |
|
|
Specifications
|
Apple Backs Down to Taylor Swift's Open Letter. Will Pay Artists During Apple Music Free Trial
I've been watching the release of Apple's new streaming service, which was just announced at the company's World Wide Developer Conference earlier this month. As part of the launch of Apple Music, customer's would be given a free trial period but during that trial period no royalties would be paid to artists.
Taylor Swift, who has previously been a strong advocate for artists' royalties (and here at the Poor Audiophile, we agree with Taylor Swift's position and have previously written about the topic here and also here) penned an open letter on Tumblr on the topic entitled, "To Apple, Love Taylor" where she said that she will be holding back her album, 1989 from Apple's new streaming service.
CNet broke the story that Apple's Eddy Cue, Apple's VP of Internet Software and Services, announced on Twitter that the Apple was reversing its "no pay" policy.
Sony to set up High-Resolution Music Stations at more than 70 Best Buy Magnolia Design Centers Nationwide
Happy 36th Birthday Sony Walkman!
We're already mightily impressed with Sony's latest offering, the NWZ-A17SLV, which we have in for review and it's emphasis on hi-res audio. Join us in wishing the Walkman a happy birthday and we certainly have high expectations from the latest generation of Walkman models.
Apple Music to be Available on Sonos Systems by Year's End
Sonos' Eric Nielsen told the Wall Street Journal via email email that the Sonos is currently working with Apple to make its Wi-Fi speakers compatible with Apple Music. According to the Journal, Apple also confirmed that the company is working with Sonos on Apple Music compatibility.
Sonos almost single handedly revolutionized the very concept of streaming speakers in the home. For years, Sonos has supported and integrated with many of the popular streaming services such as Spotify, Tidal, Rdio, Google Play Music, Pandora, Deezer, SoundCloud, and of course Beats Music, which Apple Music is replacing.
The advent of Apple's streaming service on Sonos is both consistent with Sonos' long time support for iTunes but also represents a peculiar departure for Apple to make their software service available on a non-Apple platform. However it's not unprecidented as Apple has long supplied QuickTime, iTunes, Safari and other services to Windows users.
Theta Digital Announces Modular Dreadaught D Class D Amplifier
Recording Academy to Issue High-Res Recording Guidelines to Spur High-Res Music Production
If all goes according to plan, the high-res recording guidelines will be ready for the AES (Audio Engineering Society) convention this October. The guidelines are expected to cover:
- The value of establishing workflow protocols and procedures for recording new projects at 96kHz/24-bit and higher.
- The need for utilizing best practices when transferring analog masters to hi-res digital formats.
- The importance of packaging Hi-Res Audio files with high quality digital liner notes, credits, and other descriptive metadata that complements these recordings.
- The use of best efforts when documenting the origin format ("provenance") of these recordings, in order to provide as much transparency to consumers as possible.
- A list of recommendations that support the minimum production requirements necessary to enable music labels to deliver Hi-Res Audio content.
This organized voice for the creative and technical recording community uses its nationwide network of experts to address critical issues affecting the art and craft of recorded music.
Among these issues are: the development and adoption of new technologies; recommendations for best practices in recording, master delivery, archiving and preservation; and support for both music education and education in the recording arts.
The Technology Behind the AHB2 Power Amplifier: An Interview with Benchmark Media's John Siau
Not too long ago, I sat down with audio legend Laurie Fincham, THX's Senior Vice President of Audio Research, to talk about THX's Achromatic Audio Amplifier (AAA) technology. THX's AAA technology lay at the heart of the new Benchmark AHB2 audio amplifier that had just arrived for review. Ordinarily, I would incorporate a product's technical overview in the context of the final review. However, as my discussions with John Siau, Benchmark's Vice President of Operations and Director of Engineering, progressed during the review period, I realized very quickly that taking the usual approach would do the AHB2 an incredible disservice. Even the discerning audiophile would potentially mistake the AHB2 as just another audiophile amplifier.
![]() |
Benchmark's Vice President of Operations and Director of Engineering, John Siau. |
"I have continued to do this over the years," John told me. "While studying at Syracuse, I developed an interest in digital electronics and computer graphics. When I graduated in 1980, I took my first job at the CBS Technology Center in Stamford, CT."
While at CBS, John received two patents for video image stabilization and then took a job at GE so that he could move his young family back to Syracuse, NY. After five years at GE, John began working as a consultant designing analog video, digital video, analog audio, and digital audio devices. One of his customers was Benchmark Media Systems.
John shared that in 1995 he designed Benchmark's first digital audio product, the AD2004. "A short time later,"he said, "I became an employee of Benchmark.
The rest, as they say, is history. If you've auditioned any Benchmark equipment, then you've almost certainly experienced John's handiwork first-hand. During his tenure at Benchmark, John has designed each of Benchmark's A/D and D/A converters including Benchmark's more recent microphone preamplifiers and headphone amplifiers. It's very safe to say that John's design DNA has been a key part that has established Benchmark as a de facto leader in the A/D and D/A converter market.
"We were frustrated by the fact that the performance of the DAC2 [D/A converter] could not be fully appreciated through any of the power amplifiers that were available,"lamented John. "The SNR of the DAC2 exceeded that of all available power amplifiers. The THD+N of the DAC also significantly exceeded the capabilities of all existing power amplifiers. We were confident that we could build a power amplifier that mirrored the performance of the DAC2."
"Benchmark is not new to power amplifiers," John told me. "For almost 30 years Benchmark sold the DA-101 audio distribution amplifiers for studio use. These were small 35 W card-mounted power amplifiers with a 150 kHz bandwidth, a 130 dB SNR and very low THD+N. These cards were designed to distribute line-level audio signals, but they were capable of driving speakers. Because of their outstanding performance, we often used these cards to drive monitors in our own listening room."
That long experience with the DA-101 gave Benchmark some ideas for the next generation amplifier. As John mentioned, the team at Benchmark wanted to build an amplifier to bring out the potential performance of their DAC2 products. Benchmark wanted a high power, passively-cooled power amplifier that equaled or exceeded the performance of the DA-101. It was at that point that Benchmark knew that the current technology and existing topologies by themselves wouldn't be sufficient for their needs.
"As we examined this task, it became clear that we would not reach our goals if we designed a conventional power amplifier,"John said."We realized that we needed to look at some unique solutions. We were very focused on eliminating crossover distortion in the output stage because we felt that this was one of the most important factors in the sonic performance of the amplifier. We began experimenting with bias servo circuits to extend the Class A bias region without consuming all of the power that would be needed for full Class A operation.
It was at that point, when Benchmark realized that their engineering goals couldn't be met with today's standard solutions, that a providential conversation began with THX.
John went on to tell me, "Several of the engineers at THX are good friends of ours, and they approached us about their new amplifier technology. It specifically addressed crossover distortion while maintaining high efficiency, and they felt confident that it could meet our goals. They already had a small prototype that demonstrated the feasibility of the concept. We tested the prototype and it had virtually no traces of crossover distortion, but it showed some changes in frequency response under load (a problem that was later corrected)."
He told me, "The THX achromatic technology offers vanishingly low distortion. The AHB2 exceeds the sonic performance of Class-A amplifiers while delivering efficiency that approaches that of Class-D amplifiers. Benchmark selected the technology on the basis of low distortion. From our perspective, the high-efficiency was an added bonus. The AHB2 is optimized for the lowest possible distortion and we have chosen to burn a bit more idle power in order to achieve our goals. The AHB2 has remarkable power efficiency, but the THX technology can deliver even higher efficiencies if one is willing to sacrifice some distortion performance."
John went on to explain, "We [Benchmark] designed the chassis, control systems, thermal management, and analog input stages while THX consultants designed the power supplies and amplification stages. Benchmark set the performance goals while THX provided the patented technologies that made these goals possible. The end result is a product that neither company could have produced on their own."
The average audiophile is typically familiar with only three primary amplifier topologies, Class A, Class AB, and Class D. While other topologies exist, they aren't part of an audiophile's immediate lexicon. The AHB2 is comprised of both a Class AB and Class H design (this is reflected in the product's name if you're attentive). I asked John if he could explain the topology of the Benchmark amplifier in a bit more detail and what were some of the limitations of the topologies that they had to overcome.
"Class AB amplifiers require precise control of the biasing in order to minimize push-pull crossover distortion. Class-H designs add at least two more crossover regions. The AAA technology virtually eliminates this distortion, even when no biasing is used. We have chosen to keep the output stage lightly biased, but we could operate in full Class-B mode without much of a distortion penalty."
In addition to reflecting the amplifier's topology, the AHB2 also stands for Benchmark's founder, Allen H. Burdick, and is a tribute to him. The "2" in the product's name also means that it's a two channel amplifier, stereo amplifier. Yet, for many pure-bred audiophiles, monoblock amplifiers represent the pinnacle. I asked John if there were plans to develop a monoblock version of the AHB2.
"No, this is why the amplifier has a bridged mono switch,"he replied. "If we were to create a mono version by deleting a few connectors, it would be an AHB1, but what is the point? It is nice to have the flexibility to start with a single stereo amplifier, and then migrate to two monoblocks. The AHB2 provides this upgrade path."
![]() |
The bridged mono switch on the AHB2 is located on lower left corner of the rear panel. A dedicated SpeakON connector is available for bridged mono mode. |
"Audiophiles are in for a real treat,"John said. "High-resolution audio formats and outboard D/A converters are light years ahead of most audiophile power amplifiers. In many systems, the power amplifier is a final, and very significant, barrier to achieving true high-resolution performance. Upgrading to an AHB2 can make a dramatic improvement in most high-end audiophile systems."
Discerning audiophiles who are also home theater aficionados seemingly won't be disappointed either. The ultra-low distortion and cool operating temperature of the amplifier translate into some important potential benefits, but don't bank on a multichannel version of the AHB2.
John went on to say, "In home theater applications, the AHB2 offers unmatched performance and a complete freedom from hum, hiss, and fan noise. Obviously three or more AHB2 amplifiers will be required for home theater systems, and we have been asked if we would introduce a multichannel version of the AHB2. The answer is that there is not enough power available from a standard 20 A 120 V power outlet. The size of the AHB2 is very deceptive as it can draw and deliver lots of power during audio peaks. There is no way that a 6-channel version could be driven from a single outlet. For this reason, we recommend running no more than two AHB2 amplifiers from a single 120 V circuit. Heed our advice - it's kind of a bummer to trip a circuit breaker just as the movie starts to get exciting."
Professional installers will be able to take advantage of AHB2's audiophile quality while gaining tremendous flexibility in the custom installation details that matter most.
There were several other areas about the AHB2's build quality, system architecture, and it's pairing as part of a high res multichannel system at AXPONA that John and I covered, but I'll leave those for the full review.
Needless to say, I want to express my deep thanks to John for his time throughout this interview and overall review period. The background information both John Siau and Laure Fincham have provided on the Benchmark AHB2 and THX's AAA technology hopefully give the serious audiophile a much more thorough and deeper understanding of the technology and engineering involved. Indeed, for the serious audiophile, the AHB2 has the potential to be a significant game changer. Stay tuned for our full review and see if the AHB2 lives up to all its promise.
DEG, CEA, The Recording Academy® and Major Labels Reach Agreement on Definition for High Resolution Audio
At the Poor Audiophile, we've long been advocates and proponents of high resolution audio. We're currently finishing up our time with Sony's new high-res digital Walkman and high-res headphones and we're likewise putting the finishing touches on our full review of the Benchmark AHB2 Power Amplifier. Both the Sony Walkman and the Benchmark AHB2 Amplifier been meticulously designed to be part of a high-res music system chain.
Although we've advocated for high-res music, we've also cautioned that just because something says it's high-res doesn't mean it truly is high-res. Last year, we wrote an article asking if high-res music was a farce. We felt strongly that both the recording labels and the music download sites should list out the recording and mixing chain of the music work so that consumers could be confident that they were indeed getting true high res music as opposed to up sampled CD-quality. 16/44.1 files.
This problem has been exacerbated by the fact that the industry hasn't come forth and defined exactly what high resolution music is... until now.
Much to our delight, DEG: The Digital Entertainment Group, in cooperation with the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA)® and The Recording Academy®, announced the results of their efforts to create a formal definition for High Resolution Audio, in partnership with Sony Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group.
The definition is accompanied by a series of descriptors for the Master Quality Recordings that are used to produce the hi-res files available to digital music retailers. These can be used on a voluntary basis to provide the latest and most accurate information to consumers.
“Thanks to this initiative, the industry can take a unified approach in offering digital music services a variety of information concerning the growing number of hi-res music titles being distributed today," said Amy Jo Smith, president of DEG said.
Gary Shapiro, president and CEO of CEA, stated, “The Consumer Electronics Association is pleased to have partnered with the DEG, The Recording Academy and major music labels in creating this new High Resolution Audio definition. The contributions made by our Audio Division Board will help consumer electronics manufacturers and retailers alike in their efforts to market the latest compatible devices and help provide more clarity about HRA for consumers.”
“Leading members of The Recording Academy's Producers & Engineers Wing provided valuable feedback on this new High Resolution Audio definition and descriptors for Master Quality Recordings, and we're grateful for their input and expertise," said Neil Portnow, president/CEO of The Academy. "When properly implemented, we believe this agreement will be welcomed by our members and the music community, enhancing their ability to improve the music creative process.”
High Resolution Audio is defined as “lossless audio that is capable of reproducing the full range of sound from recordings that have been mastered from better than CD quality music sources.” This latter definition will help alleviate the problems audiophiles have had with some high res audio, which was produced from CD-quality sources.
In addition to this definition, four different Master Quality Recording categories have been designated, each of which describes a recording that has been made from the best quality music source currently available. All of these recordings will sound like the artists, producers and engineers originally intended.
The descriptors for the Master Quality Recording categories are as follows:
MQ-P: From a PCM master source 48 kHz/20 bit or higher; (typically 96/24 or 192/24 content)
MQ-A: From an analog master source
MQ-C: From a CD master source (44.1 kHz/16 bit content)
MQ-D: From a DSD/DSF master source (typically 2.8 or 5.6 MHz content)
Needless to say, we should all applaud the industry for moving in this direction. These developments are welcome news to all of us audiophiles who value the fidelity of our music.
Blind Audio Testing: The Scientific Truth Behind the Myth
Audiophiles frequently "discuss" blind testing. In some people's opinion, doing a "blind test" is the only way to test whether or not one audio component sounds different than another. "All amplifiers sound the same. It's been proven in blind tests!" For others, the validity of blind testing can be problematic because of a variety of different variables.
Today, I was listening to the Home Theater Geeks podcast with Stereophile's John Iverson. (As an aside, this is a truly excellent weekly segment hosted by Scott Wilkinson. I recommend you check it out if you haven't). John Iverson made a point in the interview about blind testing that I wanted to highlight because I think he's spot on. Let me explain.
Blind testing isn't so much about the differences in the equipment as much as it is a test about the listener. Moreover, just because a listener is able to perceive a difference between Product A and Product B, you can only talk about the listener's preference for a particular product. If you want to take the variable of the listener out of the equation, then your listener panel needs training.
The importance of the listener in any kind of audio test simply cannot be emphasized enough in my opinion. As someone who has taken some listening training I can say from experience that this is a wonderfully humbling exercise. In fact, I will even go so far as to say that using untrained listeners in a "blind" test is a variable that should be explicitly stated in any test. If you're skeptical of those claims, then I suggest you check out the benefits of using trained listeners as documented here:
John Iverson's comments are right in line with the work pioneered by Dr. Floyd Toole and now Dr. Sean Olive of Harman International. Harman is the parent company of the luxury audiophile brands Mark Levinson, Revel, JBL and Lexicon. I'll highlight for a moment some previous work posted by Dr. Olive from his blog post here about a "Method for Training Listeners and Selecting Program Material for Listening Tests". I'd like to point out that when Harman's own Revel speakers subsidiary tests their speakers, they only use trained listeners.
- Olive, Sean E., "Differences in Performance and Preference of Trained Versus Untrained Listeners in Loudspeaker Tests: A Case Study,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. Vol. 51, issue 9, pp. 806-825, September 2003. Download for free here, courtesy of Harman International.
- Bech, Soren, “Selection and Training of Subjective for Listening Tests on Sound-Reproducing Equipment,” J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 40 no. 7/8 pp. 590-610 (July 1992).
- Toole Floyd E. "Subjective Measurements of Loudspeakers Sound Quality and Listener Performance," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 33, pp. 2-32 (1985 Jan./Feb.).
There are two programs that I know of that the average enthusiast can participate in to become a better, trained listener.
![]() |
Harman's How to Listen software is a free download for Mac and Windows computers |
The software is incredibly flexible. It will give you the options to input your speaker setup and fine-tune several aspects of the program material.
![]() |
Philips "How to Listen" is a free online course you can take to improve your listening skills along key metrics. |
![]() |
Philips online Golden Ears tutorial site helps you setup your system with a simple, step-by-step walkthrough. |
I also want to thank John Iverson for a great interview and great insights. I also don't take John's comments to an extreme by saying that only trained listeners can evaluate equipment.
The next time someone makes a definitive, vocal claim in some Internet forum that "Blind tests have shown that..." or, "You can't say that without blind tests..." you can tell them that without trained listeners the only thing you've proven in the blind test is something about the listeners, not the equipment being tested. Oh, and if they question you, just point them to the peer-reviewed research from the major audio industry publications ;-)
What's the Difference Between FLAC vs ALAC Lossless for audiophile recordings?
Let's face it, you're a neurotic audiophile like me who wants to squeeze every ounce of performance out of your music and your system. If you're looking for the best possible audio quality as far as digital music is concerned, then you certainly have come here wanting to know what the differences are between FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) and ALAC (Apple Lossless Audio Codec).

So, you're waiting for me to tell you that ALAC has sweeter highs and that FLAC has better bottom-end authority, right? Or perhaps you wouldn't be surprised if I told you that FLAC sounded a bit more detailed and open but ALAC had a better soundstage?
Guys, I'm sorry, but the answer is going to be way too boring—at least at first. From an audio perspective, there's no difference between FLAC or ALAC files that are recorded at the same sampling rate. That's ultimately the case because all FLAC or ALAC files are compressed versions of a "lossless" original, which means that the original file, when compressed in either format to make it smaller to store and transmit, doesn't lose any of its quality when it's played on your system.
So, if the difference isn't audible, then why are are you here and why do you get the sense that there's such a zeal and fervor over the FLAC vs. ALAC battle? It has nothing to do with audio quality and everything to do with the perceived—emphasis on the word "perceived"—Apple ecosystem lock-in and consequent player choices.
To oversimplify things, ALAC is an Apple-based solution to compress lossless file while FLAC was initially developed as an "open" format. Some high-res audiophile music download sites, like HDTracks, will give you both ALAC and FLAC, or they will give you just one and not the other. This has everything to do with their long-term disk storage and nothing about audible differences or that one format is "better" than another.
So, you can do all the reading you want, but all issues basically boil down to two simple points:
- Non-Apple people generally don't like Apple-specific technologies (I acknowledge generalizations are dangerous!)
- iTunes doesn't play FLAC files
- You can add an application on top of iTunes to play FLAC files or
- You can move to an iTunes alternative
Fluance i30 Bluetooth Wireless Speaker System Arrives for Review
When I conducted my review on the Fluance XL7F floor standing loudspeakers, I was surprised to see a few people post to the blog and then email me privately about conducting a review on Fluance's Fi30 Bluetooth wireless speaker system. I contacted the folks at Fluance to see if they would be open to the idea and they happily obliged.
Well, my Fi30 demo unit has arrived and my first impressions of the wireless speaker are very positive and fall in line with the quality of the XL7F and the Fluance wide dispersion bipolar surrounds. In other words, the quality exceeds what you would normally expect at this price point.
For only $149, the Fi30 is a steal. The system has dual 3-inch, full range drivers comprise of a woven glass fiber composite with butyl rubber surrounds. Power handling is modest at only 6wpc continuous with a frequency response of 65Hz - 20kHz. As I've repeated in several reviews, I'm not alarmed when I don't see speakers going down into the nether depths. I'd rather the design stay true to the performance characteristics and capability of the drivers as opposed to trying to do everything and ultimately making a muddy mess of the music. I felt that Fluance did a wonderful job in this arena with the XL7Fs and is continuing that trend here.
![]() |
A cross sectional view of the Fluance Fi30's MDF cabinet structure |
If you don't have Bluetooth connectivity on your phone or if you want to connect the Fluance Fi30 to your television (to use as a soundbar) or connect other devices to it, you have the option of a 3.5mm auxiliary input and you also get a USB input that will deliver 2.1A of power to charge your mobile device.
What's very unusual—and I mean this as a complement—is that Fluance unabashedly publishes the
frequency response of the Fi30 right on its site (also copied below for your convenience).
Why David Pogue is Right About the Pono Player and High Resolution Music
When David Pogue wrote his sizzling review about legendary rocker Neil Young's high resolution Pono music player, David made some major waves,—at least with some audiophiles. He said that the Pono player was like the Hans Christian Anderson's story of the Emperor's New Clothes.
Some audiophile apologists didn't agree with the review and the analogy. The digital fisticuffs escalated to the point where David Pogue had to write a follow-up article to explain himself a bit more.
First of all, let me get it out there bluntly. David Pogue is right. You read it correctly, David's right.
He's right in doing the blind testing and he's right in calling out the oh so nuanced wording of calling out Pono's wording of being better than MP3. He's also right in comparing an AAC-encoded file (which is an excellent lossy codec, by the way and far superior to MP3) to high res downloads. He's right because he doesn't have an axe to grind but he's trying to get to the bottom of the fundamental, blind path that many audiophiles have taken: that if it says Hi-Res, then it must be better and if you can't tell the difference then there's something wrong with your ability to hear the difference.
Read his articles again and you'll see that to be the case. So, David's right...with an asterisk.
Every audiophile should thank David Pogue for exposing a tremendous amount of confusion in the audiophile world about high res music players and high res music. If we have anything legitimate to complain about it's that David just didn't go far enough.
Let me explain a bit.
First of all, a high res music player at its most basic definition plays files that have a high resolution sampling rate and are saved in a lossless format. That's it, as simple as that. If a player can play a 96/24 or 192/24 file in FLAC or ALAC then it's a high res player! It does not mean (and follow my logic here please) that what that player plays will sound better than anything else.
"Wait!" you must be screaming. "How can that be? It's a high resolution music player isn't it?" Yes, it is a player capable of playing files encoded in a format. That's it. Saying it's a high res player doesn't mean it has a superior amplification stage, a superior DAC, nothing. Unfortunately, audiophiles have come to think that if something plays high resolution files then it certainly must sound better, and even significantly better.
In fact, you may be surprised to learn that playing a high resolution file on a high res player does not even guarantee that any of those "high resolution" files will sound any better than CD quality—or better than an AAC-encoded iTunes file for that matter.
This is where David Pogue nailed it on the head. There are audiophiles out there touting the superiority of high res audio with files that were only mastered at CD quality to begin with! No matter how "high resolution" you make those files, no matter what format you'll save them in, they will not suddenly become high resolution—or to use a more precise description, better sounding. In other words, yes, the emperor has new clothes and they are exactly the same clothes he wore yesterday. CD quality of a master from yesterday is still CD quality from a high-res file today.
Dr. Mark Waldrep, founder of AIX records has been a true pioneer in high resolution audio recording, mastering and playback. Mark got all of this right (Mark has a regular blog on Real HD-Audio here that I recommend to all). At the time of Pogue's Pono review, Mark put forth a broad stroke article where he hit on a few key points.
Mark's most recent post, however, really hits upon all the major points that need to be said about high resolution audio. If you think you know all there is to know about high resolution audio, think again. Read Mark's post.
I do recommend that you read the post in its entirety, but I wanted to highlight a few items specifically.
First, we've always had high resolution music. That's right! Where do we think that "high resolution" even comes from? LPs and analog tape have always been capable of incredible, high fidelity.
Second, the very term high resolution is simply defined as "better than CD." That's not the same connotation high resolution audio has for audiophiles and that's a major part of the problem. Mark puts it best when he says:
I believe we’ve been oversold on the concept of “high-res” audio or music. Up to this point, the messaging has been almost entirely fluff and spin instead of factual and transparent. The definition of high-res audio is a case in point. The DEG, CEA, NARAS, and labels definition issued a year ago can be boiled down to “better than CD”. Any release delivery format from any source with specifications that exceed 44.1 kHz/16-bit PCM fidelity qualifies as high-res. Then came the hi-res audio logo, the one that the JAS controlled (after Sony developed and promoted it). The CEA got on board and proclaimed that domestic hardware companies and “content” providers could license the logo. This became problematic when the requirements turned out to be much more stringent than the “better than CD” crowd. So now we have two sets of specifications and two logos, each with their own requirements. How’s a consumer supposed to make sense of that?Finally, Mark is advocating that we simply drop the use of the term high resolution. His inferred point is very simple. The term is so imprecise and made so confusing by the purveyors of high resolution music that it's best to drop it altogether. In Mark's own words:
So I suggest abandoning the term “hi-res” and simply providing a brief description that consumers could use to make their own evaluation of whether a file or device produces a musical experience that they enjoy. Virtually all of the content on HDtracks, PonoMusic or the others online downloads sites came from older sources…ones that may or may not have state-of-the-art fidelity. The provenance labeling could simply state that the source was a “remastered digital copy of the safety copy of the master” or “transferred from the analog master at 96 kHz/24-bits”. I was pushing the idea of a “hi-res transfer” category a couple of weeks ago. Seems like a pretty good compromise to me.
Today Only: Save $30-240 on Select Samsung Wireless Audio Speakers

Today only, BestBuy is offering select Samsung wireless speakers, compatible with Apple, Android, and Bluetooth, for $30-$240 off their regular price. In many instances, this represents more than a 60% discount. You can check out the special deal of the day here.
Benchmark AHB2 Power Amplifier Review: The First Commercial Power Amp with THX AAA Technology
We audiophiles are a truly finicky bunch. It’s very true. There is no denying it. Amplifiers are one of those areas where we audiophiles frequently display some of those demanding, even peculiar tastes.
Big, bulky amplifiers with heat sinks as large as Stegosaurus plates are a die-hard audiophile’s prized possession. We certainly can’t deny it. In most audiophiles’ minds, amplifier size equates with audiophile performance.
Dare to mention a new amplifier technology or even attempt to show a smaller-sized amplifier and—if you’re lucky—you’ll only be met with a skeptical, raised eyebrow. Anecdotally speaking, there has been some merit to that perspective over the years. One only needs to look at the sonically inferior, early incarnations of Class D amplifiers. But let’s be brutally honest for a moment. To a degree, such a closed attitude towards new amplifier technology betrays a rather closed and gentrified view of things.
When I had the opportunity to interview Laurie Fincham, who is not only THX’s Vice President but also a legendary figure in the audiophile world, I became extremely excited at the amplifier advancements made possible by THX’s new Achromatic Audio Amplifier (AAA) technology. If Laurie Fincham can put his stamp of approval on an amplifier technology then audiophiles should, at the very least, take notice.
A feed-forward design? Virtually no noise? A traditional topology with a radical reduction in waste heat, like Class D designs, but without any compromise in sound quality? Pure audiophile sound in a compact size? Seriously, could all this and more be true?
The folks at Benchmark, whose AHB2 power amplifier is the first commercially-available amplifier based on THX’s AAA technology, assured me that this was indeed the case. The AHB2 was a joint engineering effort between Benchmark Media Systems (best known for their universally heralded DACs) and THX.
The AHB2 is a 100 wpc stereo power amplifier, but boy is that ever deceiving. Benchmark says that the AHB2 can deliver up to 18A to each channel simultaneously. It will nearly double down its power to 190 wpc into 4 Ohms and 240 wpc into 3 Ohms with both channels driven simultaneously.
But the power output doesn’t stop there. With the flick of a switch you can transform the AHB2 into a monoblock amplifier. Unlike so many other amps with a bridged mono option, the AHB2 does not limit you to just 8 Ohm nominal speakers. In bridged mono, the AHB2 is rated for 6 Ohms, but there’s a bit of an asterisk to that.
In bridged mono, the AHB2 will deliver 380 Watts into 8 Ohms, and 480 Watts into 6 Ohms. Technically speaking, you can even drive speakers whose variable impedance dips into 3 Ohm range. However, if you try to exceed 486 watts into 3 Ohms bridged mono, you will trip the 18 Amp over-current protection and the amplifier will shut down.
The AHB2 is completely stable into 2.2 Ohm loads at full output level. While most amplifiers’ distortion increases when the load impedance increases, the AHB2 remains virtually distortion free. Let’s emphasize this point a bit. Unlike other amplifiers, with the Benchmark AHB2, there is no increase in distortion with an increase in impedance load. That’s just crazy.
The Signal to Noise (SNR) ratio of the AHB2 is also off the charts awesome. SNR and Dynamic range are 132 dB A-weighted in stereo and 135 dB A-weighted in bridged mono mode.
As you’ll see further down, we’ll be driving the AHB2 with a pair of Revel Ultima2 Salons. The Salon2s are nominally 6 Ohm speakers, but their variable impedance drops dips down into the upper 3 ohm range from about 40 Hz - 90 Hz and again at 200 Hz (You can view the Revel Ultima2 Salon’s full measurements here courtesy of our friends at the SoundStage network http://www.soundstagenetwork.com/measurements/speakers/revel_ultima_salon2/) and John Atkinson’s measurements at Stereophile (http://www.stereophile.com/content/revel-ultima-salon2-loudspeaker-measurements)
Arrival and Features
When I received my review sample of Benchmark’s AHB2 power amplifier, I could only think that Rick Moranis’ shrinking ray gun from the movie, Honey, I Shrunk the Kids, had been unleashed upon a beautiful, five-figure audiophile amplifier.Audiophiles have come to expect that high performance comes in a sizable form-factor. After all, many high performance audiophile amps are large. Yet right from the start, the AHB2 lets you know that it defies conventional wisdom.
But if we go down that traditional path, we’ll miss the main point of the AHB2. You cannot understand Benchmark’s AHB2 properly when you look at the amp in isolation, as just a single product. You can only understand the AHB2 properly through the lens of today’s high-resolution music.
Scott Wilkinson, host of the popular Home Theater Geeks podcast and editor at AVS Forums, teamed up with Dr. Mark Waldrep, founder of AIX Records, to put together a test to see if people could distinguish between CD quality music and high-resolution 24/96 digital files (if you’d like to take the test yourself and read up on the results, click here). While the test was not strictly scientific, it did produced some very strong anecdotal results.
One’s ability to tell the difference between high-res and CD-quality music was predicated on the quality of their setup playback chain (the high-res file, DAC/preamp, power amplifier, and speakers). People with higher performance systems could tell the difference more easily between CD quality and high-res files than lower end setups. In other words, statistically speaking, mediocre systems couldn’t reproduce the audible benefits of high-resolution music files so that listeners could discern a difference!
For years, audio critics have been touting the superiority of Benchmark’s acclaimed DAC2 models. Nevertheless, regardless of all the accolades heaped upon the DAC2, did you know that audio reviewers’ setups were actually unable to bring the DAC2 models to their full potential? The bottleneck was the amplifier. From this quest, to bring out the DAC2’s potential performance, the AHB2 was born.
Audiophiles are very slow to think of their amplifiers as the weak link in their audio system. Nevertheless, one’s power amplifier can add audible distortion to the audio chain—especially as the impedance drops—to the point where the amplifier will no longer cleanly deliver the power and current required by the loudspeaker. Benchmark was determined to solve this problem and create an amplifier that could bring out the full performance of the DAC2 without all of the problems associated with traditional amp designs.
The feed-forward error correction of THX’s AAA™ technology keeps the AHB2 nearly distortion free when driving a heavy load. As noted in our interview with audio legend Laurie Fincham, THX’s Senior Vice President of Audio Research, the AHB2 is the first commercial amplifier in the world to use THX’s patented AAA™ technology to eliminate virtually all forms of distortion.
Benchmark set specific performance goals for distortion, frequency response, drive current, damping factor, and output noise. Benchmark designed an FPGA-based protection system to protect the amplifier from damage without interfering with the audio performance. The AHB2 is a high-efficiency design, but THX’s AAA technology can be pushed to deliver higher efficiencies at the cost of some increase in distortion. Overall, the engineering is something to marvel at. The AHB2 measures at -118db THD.
In John’s own words, “The low noise of the AHB2 is due to careful engineering. It is not related to the use of feed-forward error correction or to the use of the THX-AAA technology. The power supply on the AHB2 is exceptionally clean, and all circuits are designed with low impedances and high signal levels in order to reduce the effects of thermally-induced ‘Johnson noise.’” The results for such meticulous attention speak for themselves. On paper alone, the signal-to-noise ratio of the AHB2 is nothing short of astonishing, boasting a 132db SNR.
You may be wondering how this performance impacts heat dissipation. Well, the AHB2 runs relatively cool, though not as cool as most Class D amps. Therefore, it has prominent heat sinks to help dissipate heat in case the amp is driven very hard. In such cases where it is driven hard, it will get very warm to the touch. In my experience with the amp, that was certainly the case.
While the AHB2 is a Class AB amplifier, in many ways it is a radical departure from conventional class AB amplifier designs. I spoke with John Siau about some of these differences and he highlighted the following:
- The amplifier’s low gain (9 dB) allows +22 dBu input at amplifier clip, which is essential for low noise.
- The AHB2’s patented feed-forward error correction virtually eliminates crossover distortion and improves the damping factor. The feed-forward design makes bias currents unnecessary, and non-critical. This would make Class B operation possible with very low distortion, but we keep the output stage in Class AB operation. The feed-forward design also makes class H or G operation possible with no rise in distortion at class H or G switch point (Class H (or G) rail switching at a 1/3 power threshold).
- The AHB2 is much more efficient than a conventional class AB design. Peak power does not vary with AC line voltage (due to the amp’s regulated supply). Power drawn on one channel does not influence the power available on the other channel.
- The AHB2 is a linear amplifier. It is not a switching amplifier. For this reason, it produces very little out-of-band noise. A-weighted noise is only 2 dB less than noise measured over an 80 kHz bandwidth. For Benchmark, this was an important design goal because ultrasonic noise can be folded into the audio band by non-linearities in speaker transducers.
- On the AHB2, multiple output stages run in parallel to eliminate crossover distortion. One output stage is active while another is in the crossover region.
- The class AB output stages use very low bias currents and due to low bias currents, idle power consumption is only 20 W
- The high-bandwidth control loop on the switch-mode power supply responds to amplifier loading over the entire audio band and at ultrasonic frequencies
- The AHB2 does not rely on capacitive energy storage.
- The switch-mode power supply reduces AC line magnetic interference to levels that would not be possible with a linear power supply.
- >200 kHz bandwidth to achieve excellent inter-channel phase matching at 20 kHz.
- < 0.1 Hz low frequency cutoff to minimize low-frequency phase shift.
Only when you understand that the AHB2 was envisioned as the amplification for a high-resolution audio chain can you fully come to understand the brilliance of the product’s design. That’s where its hyper-focus on eliminating noise and distortion stem from.
For example, unlike most amplifiers, there is a gain switch that you use to match the amplifier to your preamplifier’s output. If you’re using a DAC2 or professional line-level equipment, you simply set it to the lowest position. If you’re using a preamplifier with balanced connections, you set it to either low-gain or mid-gain position (as you will see below your ears will know right away which is the right position), and if you’re using an unbalanced connection, you set it to the top position. Simple, right? The purpose of the gain switch is to make sure that the amplifier isn’t over-amplifying the noise from your system’s signal chain to the loudspeakers and to allow the amp to operate at maximum output without clipping.
The real question is, “Did Benchmark succeed?” I took the AHB2 for an extended review, using it as my reference amplifier for nearly three months, to find out.
Setup
My initial setup from Benchmark consisted of a single AHB2 running in stereo with Benchmark’s DAC2 HGC digital to analog converter. Throughout my review period with the AHB2 I swapped between the Benchmark DAC2 and my Anthem AVM50v 3D.Although I initially connected the AHB2 to my Revel Ultima2 Salons using my existing speaker cables, I became so enamored with the SpeakON connectors on the AHB2 that I discarded my cables in favor of the SpeakON cables Benchmark provided. I never looked back. Believe me, once you have the option to use SpeakON connections between your speakers and a power amplifier, you’ll eschew your current cables just as I did.
I made sure to follow Benchmark’s recommended setup for optimal digital audio and high-resolution playback, which is:
Two-channel digital source —> DAC2 —> AHB2
By connecting your two-channel digital sources directly to the DAC2 you will have a true high-resolution playback system that is capable of 127 dB system SNR with bandwidth that is, in Benchmark’s own words, “limited by the digital format.”
During one of my email exchanges with John Siau about optimal high-resolution playback and multichannel high-resolution playback, he shared with me that Benchmark, Revel, and AIX Records were going to have a room at AXPONA in Chicago to showcase the performance of high-resolution audio.
The planned AXPONA setup would consist of five Revel Ultima2 Salons. The five Salon2 speakers would be driven by five AHB2 power amplifiers running in bridged mono. A modified Oppo Blu-ray player was equipped with dedicated S/PDIF digital outputs which fed 3 DAC2 converters. The converters would also be connected to AES digital outputs on a PC running JRiver. In either mode of operation all six audio channels provided bit transparent digital outputs from the AIX demo disks. Talk about a system to die for!
Given that I too would be testing the Benchmark AHB2 power amplifier with a pair of Revel Ultima2 Salons, John sent me a second AHB2 so that I could mimic the amplification setup of the AXPONA show. However, instead of a multichannel setup consisting of five Salon2s, I would be running the full Benchmark setup in traditional two-channel.
For the next several months, I ran each AHB2 in bridged mono. I feel it is important to note that when an amplifier has the option of running in bridged mono, it usually cannot drive lower-impedance loads. The Ulitma2 Salons dip down into a 3 Ohm load. John assured me that the AHB2 would have no problem handling the Salon2s in bridged mono. The only potential scenario that would send the amps into thermal protection would be if I drove the speakers very hard near ear-bleed levels. Regular listening would be no problem. John was spot on with his assessment.
![]() |
Rear panel detail of the Benchmark AHB2 Power Amplifier |
As I mentioned earlier, in addition to the Benchmark DAC2, I also used my Anthem AVM50v 3D preamp-processor to test the AHB2 for movies and home theater. When I connected the AHB2 to the Anthem and then ran ARC’s (Anthem Room Correction) calibration, I had an interesting anomaly.
When the ARC calibration started, the Ultima2 Salons sounded like the volume had been turned way down. The volume difference between the Salons and the rest of the setup was startling. In fact, ARC yielded an error because the volume output on the Salon2s was so low. ARC was unable to compensate. Unless I lowered the volume of my dual SVS SB13-Ultra subwoofers by a full -8db, ARC would not complete an audio sweep. When I lowered the dual subwoofers’ volume levels, ARC finished its calibration without issue. The final reference target volume was only about 68-69db instead of the reference 75db. I re-ran the calibration with the AHB2’s gain setting in the middle position, raised the subwoofer volume back up by 8db and bingo the results were back at reference—75db.
If you read the user manual, the AHB2 states that either the mid- or low-gain setting should be used when using balanced connections (which I was). I used the low-gain setting based on the user manual’s guidance and that was what I was using with the DAC2. In case you are wondering, the low-gain setting is the correct setting when using a DAC2.
I asked John Siau about this peculiar experience and he explained that the low-gain setting is intended for use with professional audio sources (such as the Benchmark D/A converters). Most consumer and audiophile products will require the use of the higher gain settings. Audiophile balanced connections usually require the mid-gain setting. Consumer-grade unbalanced sources will require the high-gain setting.
I related to John that I perceived there being a difference between the low-gain and mid-gain setting. When I put the Anthem to the mid-gain setting, it sounded… well… noisier. John told me that products that cannot deliver high signal levels usually cannot deliver high signal to noise ratios. The noise I was hearing in the mid-gain position was the Anthem/ARC combination and not the AHB2.
To put it into raw numbers, the Anthem AVM50v 3D has a SNR of 104 db. The AHB2 by contrast has a SNR of 135db in bridged mono. The Anthem is 31 db noisier than the AHB2 and and 23 dB noisier than a DAC2, a potentially audible difference. For this reason, John told me, “This is why we always recommend driving the AHB2 directly from the Benchmark DAC2. Do not insert a preamplifier or processor between the DAC2 and the AHB2. Almost any inserted preamplifier will raise the system noise by about 25 dB. The DAC2 is much cleaner and quieter than other preamplifiers. The comparison is not even close.”
If you have a multichannel pre-pro or receiver and want to get optimal performance out of the AHB2, Benchmark recommends that you use a DAC2 for two-channel listening and run the DAC2 in Home Theater (HT) Bypass mode. Using such a setup, which is very common with high end two channel preamps, you run unbalanced cables from your multichannel pre-pro to the DAC2 and then select the analog input on the DAC2. The HT Bypass mode will automatically activate and it will ramp the DAC2 volume control up to maximum. In multi-channel mode, your system volume will be controlled by your pre-pro or receiver in your home theater system. In other words, in such an architecture, you get the best of both worlds.
Because it can be confusing, here is what Benchmark says your optimal setup should look like:
Multichannel Playback:
- Multichannel Source > Multichannel Pre-pro/Receiver > DAC2 > AHB2
Stereo Playback:
- Stereo Source --> DAC2 --> AHB2
- Stereo Source --> DAC2 --> Multichannel Pre-Pro/Receiver --> AHB2
- Stereo Source --> Multichannel Pre-Pro/Receiver --> DAC2 --> AHB2
With everything ready-to-go, I was anxious to put the AHB2 through an extended trial.
Listening Tests:
One of my first critical listening sessions was with Sade’s Soldier of Love. Sade’s husky yet smooth contralto vocals can serve as an audiophile’s aural panacea. The DAC2 and AHB2 combo reproduced this album with an intoxicating quality. The opening track, “The Moon and the Sky” evoked palpable, audible images of a “you are there” experience. Sade’s vocals streamed forth as though emanating from a pitch black, quiet night on a desert island. Bass lines on every cut were clean and taut. They also had great punch.Even though I was initially playing the AHB2 in stereo and it was rated at only 100W, I never felt like I was lacking power and performance. Not once did I sense that the amp was gasping for breath. Soldier of Love was like a clinic in speaker control. Instruments started, stopped, and snapped with precision; and the black, quiet backdrop of Benchmark’s dynamic duo allowed me to hear deeper into the music, picking up delicate nuances and details that ordinarily would be overshadowed or muddied by a lesser signal chain.
I had the same experience with Thao Nuguyen. Instruments from Thao Nguyen’s alternative rock cut, “Bag of Hammers” popped from a dead black background. Thao’s vocals were exceptionally well rounded. There’s a lot acoustically going on in this song and the Benchmark combo held it all together in a wonderfully coherent soundstage that preserved just about every detail imaginable.
As I played album after album and track after track, I became increasingly sensitized to the absence of noise and distortion and the beautiful cloak of silence. It is so incredibly hard to put into words the experience that the DAC2 —> AHB2 —> Revel Ultima2 Salon setup produced. There was simply no distortion, no noise, just a blank stage. Regardless of genre, vocals and instruments popped to life and they did so with a almost true-to-life “you are there” feel to them.
To make an analogy, the noiseless, distortion-free background that the Benchmark produced was similar to the effect you get listening to live orchestra where the instruments simply spring to life from a space in time. To put it another way, for those of you who remember the old cassette tapes, you will easily recall the noise they produced. When you were listening, you didn’t always readily realize the noise and distortion that was there. However, once you turned on Dolby B, C, or S noise reduction, not only was the noise gone, but you then realized that the noise was part of what you were listening to. You had simply become accustomed to it. Unlike Dolby noise reduction, however, the AHB2 didn’t kill the purity and clarity of the highs. The full audio range remained dazzlingly clean and open.
That Dolby-style noise reduction was in full display on Fairground Attraction’s album, Aye Fond Kiss. I’ve played the opening track, “Jock O’Hazeldean” dozens and dozens of times. The difference playing this song through the Benchmark Combo was immediately tell-tale. Vocals and instruments were hung on a velvety wall of silence. Bass lines had life and intricate nuances to them. The texture of the instruments was more readily palpable and discernible.
Transitioning to the AHB2 to bridged mono was like loading the Salon2s with bazookas. There’s bass and then there’s bass. The Salons are some of the most capable full-range speakers on the planet. When paired with the AHB2s in bridged mono, bass notes were the cleanest, most detailed, and most controlled I’ve ever heard out of the Salon2s. What I appreciated most of all was how increasingly detailed the bass became. It’s as though the noise floor was lowered to such a degree that you no longer had something fighting for attention. I was able to hear more and discern more.
Because the AHB2 was born and bred for high-res playback, it was time to let the amp flex its stuff. I played many high-res audio tracks through the signal chain. However, allow me to highlight the Naxos 2xHD 192kHz/24bit recording of Saint Saëns Symphony No. 3 “Organ” by the Malmo Symphony Orchestra with Marc Soustrot conducting. I downloaded the high res album from Acoustic Sounds.
Saint Saëns Symphony No. 3 is a well-known classical masterpiece and audiophile test track. With its beautiful, deep, resonating organ notes, this symphony is a rite of passage for any full-range audio system. What impressed me immensely was not only the AHB2’s command of the entire audio spectrum but also the pristine presentation from top to bottom. The organ notes were deep and rich. I cranked the volume. No noise. No distortion. No hint of strain.
Instruments never intruded on one another to blur the masterful orchestral illusion before me. From a backdrop of pure vacuous space, the symphonic elements danced gracefully across the soundstage. Every group of instruments was firmly entrenched in its own space in time. The presentation was nothing short of glorious.
The delicate notes of violins resonated precisely, perfectly laid out and you were able to discern the tonal character of the strings and the warmth of the violin’s body. The resonant timbre of brass notes was spot on. The entire orchestra came together in a coherent, dynamic whole. If this is high-res music, then I will take it with joy every time. There wasn’t a single note where the DAC2/AHB2 combination didn’t bring out the immaculate character of the Salon2s. Crescendo!
Moving back out the realm of high-res to rock, I popped in U2’s classic album, the Joshua Tree. The first notes of the synthesizer from the opening cut, “Where the Streets Have No Name” were deep, tight, and intense. My entire room pressurized without any bloat or distortion. The Edge’s characteristic guitar riffs had clinical precision; but it was Bono’s vocals that stole the show. Never—and I mean never—have I heard such a detailed, spot on vocal presentation through the Salon2s. Bono’s vocals came to life, not only through their timbre, but through the presence of the slightest audible cues that you can discern in an intimate audio session. I pursed my eyes closed and just blurted out an ecstatic “wow!” What I’m going to say isn’t a hyperbole. Although I’ve been playing the Joshua Tree for almost 29 years, this was the first time I ever heard the album in all its glory.
There are so many other musical sessions I could gush upon, but let me just highlight Elaine Paige. The First Lady of British Musical Theater’s vocals have set the standard for so many beloved musical pieces. Playing “Don’t Cry For Me Argentina” from Evita and “I Dreamed a Dream” from Lés Miserables through the Salon2s and AHB2s were like a personal concert in my living room. But it was Elaine Paige’s rendition of “Memory” from the musical Cats that literally sent every hair on my body standing on end. I cranked it up louder, and played it again. I cranked it up even louder, and played it yet again. Each time, the emotional response was the same. Elaine’s vocals were so clean, so detailed, so emotive, so free of any hint of distortion that it was uncanny.
It’s no surprise the movies through the Anthem AVM50v were a cake walk for the AHB2s and the Salon2s. I won’t belabor the the expected and the obvious. The audio experience with American Sniper, Big Hero 6, Kingsman: The Secret Service, Tron Legacy, and Gravity to name just a few that have outclassed many a commercial movie theater. I never clipped the AHB2 in stereo mode but I did trip one of the bridged mono AHB2 amplifiers into over current protection (at 486W) when I was playing Gravity at near ear-bleeding reference levels.
The AHB2 showed time and again, it could attain total mastery over any genre and elevate it to a blissful experience.
Conclusion
The Benchmark AHB2 Power Amplifier is one of the finest sonic experiences to ever come through my system. The AHB2 belongs on every audiophile’s short list. Yes, it’s that good.Don’t judge this amp by its size. Judge it by its specs. Judge it by its emotional impact. The AHB2’s power, finesse, and measurable freedom from noise and distortion bring with it the potential to elevate every aspect of your listening experience. If you think you’ve heard your system free from noise and distortion, think again. The AHB2 will change your perception.
If you are determined to get the most out of high-resolution audio then you need a system whose optimal performance can bring out deliver the full potential of high-res audio. There is no more compelling case than to anchor a high-res setup with the Benchmark DAC2 and AHB2 combo.
The Benchmark AHB2 amplifier and DAC2 preamplifier took complete, unfettered control of the universally acclaimed Revel Ultima2 Salon speakers and never let go. In fact, the AHB2 allowed the Salon2s to achieve pinnacle performance. At $2,995 the AHB2 isn’t cheap; but its build quality, materials, and astonishing sonic performance are a marvel.
The AHB2 is an audiophile’s dream and a competitor’s nightmare. For my part, I don’t want my dream with the AHB2 to end. Not only does the AHB2 get my highest and strongest recommendation, but it also gets an enthusiastic nod as our 2015 Audiophile Amplifier of the Year.
Benchmark Media Systems, Inc.
203 East Hampton Place, Floor 2
Syracuse, NY 13206 USA
- 100 Watts per channel into 8 Ohms, both channels driven; 130 Watts per channel into 6 Ohms, both channels driven; 190 Watts per channel into 4 Ohms, both channels driven; 240 Watts per channel into 3 Ohms, both channels driven
- 380 Watts Bridged Mono into 8 Ohms; 480 Watts Bridged Mono into 6 Ohms
- Revel Ultima2 Salon Loudspeakers
- Anthem AVM50v 3D multichannel processor
Is there a difference with high resolution audio files? I'm taking the test to find out with Revel, Benchmark, and AIX
High resolution (Hi-Res) audio has become an increasingly important topic in audiophile circles over the past few years. Some audiophiles have eschewed digital mediums because of the perception that they were sonically harsh or inferior. Hi-res audio promises to change all that, of course.
Many audiophiles have blindly jumped onto the high-res bandwagon and Dr. Mark Waldrep of AIX Records has been advocating on the concept of digital provenance— the origin or lineage — of a digital file from recording to mastering to hi-res. Mark correctly points out that many hi-res files marketed as hi-res are nothing more than CD-quality files at a higher sampling rate. In other words, just because something says it's hi-res doesn't mean that the fidelity of the track is high definition. David Pogue's scathing review of the Pono Music Player and hi-res music just added fuel to the fire and the ire.
Living with the Benchmark Media Systems exceptional DAC2 HGC digital to analog converter and preamp and the AHB2 power amplifier over the past several months made me wonder about hi-res audio quite a bit. Indeed, one of the big selling points of the DAC2/AHB2 combination is it's ability to play back the fidelity of hi-res audio. Once my review period was over, I decided to embark on a few additional tests and see if I myself could truly tell the difference with hi-res audio.
I had been aware but never taken the experiment conducted at Scott Wilkinson at AVS Forum and Dr. Mark Waldrep. The purpose of the experiment was "to explore whether or not true high-resolution audio files—with information beyond what a Redbook CD can accommodate—can be reliably distinguished from the same files that have been downconverted to CD specs." To emphasize, this was merely an experiment and not a scientifically controlled environment. You can read about the parameters of the experiment here.
To summarize, Mark took three hi-res recordings that were recorded, edited, and mastered at 24/96. Mark did not alter the tracks dynamically. He then took each clip and downsampled them to 16 bits/44.1 kHz (Redbook CD audio), using the "gentlest" triangular PDF algorithm in Sonic Studio's Sonic Process. Then, the downsampled version was upsampled back to 24/96 without adding audio data that wasn't in the lower-res file. By doing this, someone would not be able to immediately which version was which based on file size or sampling rate indicator on a pre-pro or computer. The two versions of the files were then made available for download in uncompressed WAV format.
With the Benchmark electronics driving a pair of Revel Ultima2 Salons, I felt as though the setup clearly met and exceeded the parameters set by Scott Wilkinson's experiment. I then loaded the files on my Mac and played them with VLC and made sure that my MIDI audio settings on the Mac were accordingly adjusted to output the hi-res file sampling rate.
Even though I was aware of the experiment and aware of the statistical results of who was able to tell the difference between the hi-res and non-hi-res versions. Moreover, I had made it a point to deprive myself of finding out which file was hi-res and which was the 16/44.1 version. I also did not open the files in any audio editing software in an attempt to look at the waveform. In other words, if I was going to take the experiment, then I was going to do it openly and honestly—even putting myself out on a limb.
I will confess that I was a bit nervous taking the experiment. Was hi-res audio really a farce? Throwing caution into the wind, I spun up the first track, Just_My_Imagination. I didn't wait to listen through the entire song. I flipped to the alternate version and then back and forth and I could perceive sonic differences. The saxophone and percussion were areas where I could clearly hear the difference. I went to the next track, Mosaic, and sure enough, the difference was there too. With mosaic in particular, the triangle and upper frequencies shimmered with what I felt was the hi-res file. The final track, On_the_Streets_Where_You_Live, didn't disappoint either. As soon as the vocals kicked in, I could not only tell a difference between the two files but the file I perceived to be the hi-res version had instant dimensionality to it compared to the Redbook CD version which sounded more muted and didn't seem to have as airy a presentation.
I felt that the differences were so apparent and so clear that I didn't need to listen through an entire song. I quickly dropped Mark Waldrep and John Siau of Benchmark a note documenting my results and I sent a separate email to Scott Wilkinson copying Mark and John.
There is no question in my mind that the Revel-Benchmark combination lived up to its billing.
I then brought my wife and my teenager in front of the setup. "Surely," I thought, "They too would be able to hear the difference!" It was late and we had just come back from seeing a movie but they accommodated my request. My teen sat in the sweetspot and my wife was lying down at almost 90 degrees to the left Salon2. Sure enough, both my teen and my wife heard differences between the files but who preferred which version of the file varied. My teen was more closely aligned with my results and my wife seemed to prefer what I thought were the Redbook CD versions. Depending on the results, I guess I'll either be vindicated or I'll need to hand off the audiophile reins of this site to my wife!
I hope to hear back soon on whether or not my perceptions and answers were right or wrong. I also plan on taking the same experiment again using the Benchmark DAC2's headphone amplification section and plugging in the Sony MDR-1A hi-res headphones and Sennheiser HD-600 headphones to see if I can still perceive a difference in the files when wearing a pair of headphones.
Hi-Res Audio Test: Looks Like I Got Two of Three Right in the Experiment
I downloaded the test files from AVS Forum for the high resolution audio experiment. I played them on the Benchmark - Revel system combination. Dr. Mark Waldrep from AIX was kind enough to let me know which files were which and it looks like I got two of the three right.
Disappointing and head scratching. Does that shake my faith in my hearing? Nope.
The fundamental question to me isn't whether or not one can discern a difference between hi-res music and CD-quality music files—indeed, there was clearly an audible difference. Rather, I'm trying to understand why we may have a certain preference for one file or another.
When I downloaded and played the files, I emailed Mark immediately with my answers to act as a "date-stamp" on my first listen and I noted to him the following:
I was so confident I knew the difference [between the files] that I never finished listening to any of the songs—that’s how obvious I felt the difference was—and only did the test once....In my particular review setup with the Benchmark/Revel combo, the differences in the files were easily noticeable within the first 10 seconds of each track. Even my teenager and my non-audiophile wife were able to distinguish differences between the files. However, who preferred which file varied!So that's the interesting question: preference. I'm going to go back and listen to the files again and especially the only track I got wrong, "Mosaic," in more detail. Moreover I bet I know exactly where I got it wrong. One thing that really struck me was how different certain audible cues were between the files.
I'm quite certain that the audible cue leading me to that incorrect conclusion about "Mosaic" was the triangle. I know I focused immediately on that as the sole indicator as to which file was hi-res.
On what I know to now be the low res version of the file, I felt as though the triangles had a sharper, biting edge to them. I interpreted that as increased resolution and detail. The hi res version was indeed smoother but I clearly interpreted that as being a rounding off and dulling of the higher frequencies due to compression. I perceived that sharpness as the determining audio cue that "aha!" this certainly must be the hi-res version of the file.
Sometimes, I do loathe being analytical about musical reproduction. It then becomes more about the gear and not about the music. I've always passionately believed that being an audiophile is all about the music. The gear is just a means to an end.
I'm going to try and do this test again with a few people; and this time, I'm going to have someone else control which file is being played so that there's no ability to know which one is A or B. This is by no means scientific but it's certainly fun. If this experiment does anything, it certainly makes me agree even more with Mark's long-time stances on the state of hi-res and the industry. In fact, if you're interested in this topic, you owe it to yourself to visit Mark's daily blog at: http://www.realhd-audio.com.
While I was hoping to go three for three, that just didn't happen and I'm OK with that. This only further piques my interest in hi res audio. I'm hoping to do an in-depth interview with Dr. Mark Waldrep on the topic of hi-res audio in the coming weeks. Stay tuned.
Sony Walkman NWZ-A17 Digital Music Player and MDR-1A Headphone Review
Today, many people access music through their portable devices—especially their phones. But, most phones, tablets, and portable music players are focused on mobility, not audio quality. These products tend to have mediocre audio stages and terrible headphones. They also carry with them the vestiges of digital music’s advent as evidenced by the mediocre music formats and resolutions they support. They don’t support proper playback of high resolution (Hi-Res) digital music formats, such as FLAC and ALAC. And they certainly don’t reproduce sampling rates up to 24bit/192kHz, which are capable of delivering a more realistic dynamic range; better resolution and detail; and a life-like, “you are there” musical presentation.
Sony aims to change all that with its current Walkman line of products, which includes the Sony NWZ-A17 Walkman Hi-Res Digital Music Player ($299.99 MSRP) and its top-of-the-line NWZ-ZX2 ($1,999.99). Sony’s current Walkman line of Hi-Res players marks the first Sony digital music players to drop “MP3” as part of their name. That’s a major statement.
With iPod sales declining precipitously year-over-year and seemingly everyone consuming digital music on their phones, one could rightly ask, “What on earth is Sony thinking by launching a dedicated player? Are they nuts?” Well, Sony’s thinking is that many listen to their smartphone for portable music, there are lots of people who want a dedicated device for high quality music playback. One could argue that Sony’s point was resoundingly validated with the unprecedented mega-success of the Pono High Resolution Music Player Kickstarter Campaign. Sony is hoping this new Walkman will tap into that huge undercurrent of people who value the quality of their portable music.
Thankfully, Sony has gone one step further than the Pono. Sony has thought through the entire signal chain, not just the player. Complementing the Sony NWZ-A17 Walkman Hi-Res Digital Music Player is the Sony MDR-1A high resolution headphones ($299.99 MSRP). The Sony MDR-1A headphones have been designed as a companion to the Hi-Res Walkman. As we pointed out in our extensive review of the Benchmark AHB2 power amplifier, to gain the full benefits of Hi-Res music, you need to have your entire signal chain—from source file to speaker—all capable of reproducing the fidelity of Hi-Res music.
The Sony MDR-1A come with two detachable 1/8” cables that are 1.2m in length. There is a conventional audio cable and one with an in-line microphone and remote cable for smartphone use. Sony says that the supplied cables are a 4-wire-architecture, with silver-coated oxygen-free copper (OFC) to ensure minimal signal transmission degradation and better audio response at the driver. The cables have a separate ground and signal connection to each driver.
The diaphragm used in the MDR-1A headphones is a 40 mm, dome type, aluminum-coated liquid crystal polymer diaphragm. The headphones can handle 1500 mW (IEC) and have a rated frequency response of 3Hz - 100 kHz. Sony claims that reproducing frequencies up to 100kHz is ideal for high-res music. Even though the limits of human hearing are only up to 20kHz, properly recorded high-resolution music files will indeed capture musical information beyond the limits of human hearing. Whether or not that makes any difference is a matter of debate and beyond the scope of this review. All you need to know is that true high resolution music files have extra information in those upper frequencies and the Sony combo can play it back.
First Impressions and Features
We did a fairly extensive overview of both the A17 Walkman and MDR-1A headphones. You can read our complete first impressions during our unboxing article here. To further elaborate on our first impressions, it’s clear Sony understood that the Walkman would be carried in addition to a portable phone. In order to make the Walkman something you’d wouldn’t mind carrying along as a second device, it had to be small. Sony created the A17 as what they claim to be the worlds smallest Hi-Res music player. Notice the emphasis on the phrase, “Hi-Res music player.”Indeed, the Sony Walkman is sleek and slender. It’s 1 3.4” wide by 4 3/8” tall and only 3/8” thick. It weighs in at only 2.4 oz. The A17 Walkman doesn’t measure up to the feel and minimalist style of the original or current iPod Nano. Then again it thankfully isn’t the unwieldy size of the Pono either.
![]() |
Sony's Hi-Res Walkman |
There’s a standard 3.5mm headphone jack on the bottom of the unit. Along the right hand side are volume buttons, a hold button, and a MicroSD memory card slot. On the lower left corner of the unit, Sony has included a small loop for a lanyard.
I would call the Sony Walkman’s home screen simple and basic. It doesn’t have an updated feel to it. The iconographic representations don’t have any real draw or flair to them. In other words, they are there to be functional and that’s about it.
Speaking of function, the Sony allows you to do all the basic things you’ve come to expect in a player such as scroll through albums, artists, or songs, and create playlists. For a Hi-Res music player, Sony didn’t dumb down the device. I was pleasantly surprised to see that you can mount the A17 Walkman right on your desktop and use it as a removable flash drive.
It’s capable of storing and displaying photos and videos and also functioning as an FM radio. While Sony says that the device will support video and photos, I can’t imagine anyone seriously using the Walkman for such purposes. I found the TFT screen simply to be too low-resolution to be tolerable for anything like that.
Sony is touting that the A17 Walkman borrows some of the engineering enhancements of its other flagship products. For example, Sony says that the A17 is inspired by the NWZ-ZX1’s thicker wiring and high-grade POSCAP capacitor for power supply stability; that it borrows from the PHA-2’s double-thickness, copper foil printed circuit board; and that it has the same high purity solder as the ES-series.
The Walkman’s is made of an aluminum die-cast chassis that Sony says helps reducing any unnecessary electrical noise. Within the chassis, Sony managed to fit a rechargeable Lithium-ion battery that’s capable of up to 50 hours of MP3 playback and 30 hours of Hi-Res music playback. The battery life of the Sony blows away all its rivals in the Hi-Res music market by an almost 3:1 margin when compared to the Astell & Kern AK 120 and an almost 5:1 margin with other competitors. Long after your mobile phone is dead, at least your music will keep on playing!
The Sony’s internal storage is a modest 64GB. However, you can expand the storage up to 192GB with a micoSD card. For those with large music collections, you could theoretically pre-load microSD cards by genre and then take them with you to go. It’s mind-boggling to think where we were just 10 or 15 short years ago with large portfolios of CDs. Today, you can carry along a massive library in a footprint smaller than a postage stamp.
Sony has included their Digital Sound Enhancement Engine, which they abbreviate as DSEE HX. Sony says that DSEE HX upscales digital music files “to near high-resolution audio quality” by restoring sound that gets lost in the compression process. I’m personally not a big fan of these DSP solutions. I know some users find them to be euphonic, but I’d much rather invest in better quality recordings. I don’t like such things and didn’t try it. Nevertheless, it’s there as a feature for users to try it out.
For those who need convenience in addition to high quality playback, the A17 Walkman features Bluetooth and NFC (Near Field Communication) connectivity. There is no support for WiFi. You can use Bluetooth headphones with the A17 and NFC makes pairing the two as simple as a tap on your wireless headphones. I find that Bluetooth audio playback is very noisy and not something I would consider for reference listening.
Sony has tried to address some of the most problematic limitations of wireless headphone playback by including AAC and aptX codec support. AptX is supposed to produce CD-quality (16bit/44.1kHz) playback over Bluetooth connections. In my experience, it works pretty well. While wireless connectivity won’t give you all the benefits of Hi-Res music, it’s great to see that Sony included wireless connectivity as a convenience.
But let’s face it, if you’re going to spend $299 on this Sony Walkman, it’s all about the music. Thankfully, the Sony supports the most popular lossless formats you’d find on high resolution download sites such as FLAC and Apple Lossless (ALAC). It will also support L-PCM, AIFF, WAV, WMA, AAC, and MP3. Surprisingly, DSD is not a natively supported format. If you want DSD support, you need to step up to Sony’s significantly more expensive $1,200 flagship, the NW-ZX2 Walkman. Those with DSD music collections will need to cross-convert those files to either FLAC or ALAC using a program such as XLD. See our article on XLD here.
To let you know that you are playing a Hi-Res file, the Sony displays a small “HD” notification right on the screen. To emphasize the point, just because the Walkman is showing that HD image does not guarantee that the Hi-Res file is was recorded and mixed in Hi-Res. Sadly, Hi-Res doesn’t always mean Hi-Res. Nevertheless, it’s a nice little feature that I appreciated during my listening.
Setup and Use
I received my review set, consisting of the Sony NWZ-A17 Walkman and MDR-1A headphones, in non-consumer packaging. The combo was obviously used at the 2015 Consumer Electronics Show (CES). The Walkman was pre-loaded with CES audio files giving an overview of the Sony booth. I had to chuckle.The Walkman also came pre-loaded with a digital copy of Dr. Chesky’s exceptional recording, The Ultimate Headphone Demonstration Disc. The Ultimate Headphone Demonstration Disc contains uncompressed high resolution music with high dynamic range. For comparison, it contains the same files with different levels of compression applied so you can hear the difference between H-Res and CD-Quality music. Including these audio files was a simply brilliant move on Sony’s part. If you ever had any doubt about the merits of how life-like uncompressed, Hi-Res music can sound, you haven’t heard this demo CD. It’s amazing.

To make sure that I was able to sample additional Hi-Res music, Sony provided me with a high resolution download of my choice from Acoustic Sounds. I chose the 24bit/192kHz version of Saint-Saëns: Symphony No. 3 - Symphony in A Major - Le rouet d'Omphale. This version was also available as a 24bit/352kHz FLAC download. I chose the 192kHz version simply because the Walkman didn’t support the higher sampling rate. I listened to this album many times and used it repeatedly during my review of Benchmark’s truly exceptional DAC2 digital-to-analog converter and AHB2 power amplifier in a high resolution signal chain.
While ensuring that I had access to a wide variety of high resolution music material, my experience with Acoustic Sounds once again brought up the point championed by Dr. Mark Waldrep, who has repeatedly advocated for the full disclosure of a recording’s provenance. Only when you know how an album was recorded and mastered can you truly know that you are getting all the benefits of high resolution. Otherwise, you can’t tell what you’re really getting. Unfortunately, there was nothing obvious on Acoustic Sounds about which recording was indeed truly high resolution.
Examining the Sony’s physical elements and its specs, it was pretty evident that Sony did an admirable job of thinking through the Walkman’s function in a high resolution signal chain. But one thing about the Sony that was a bit of a head scratcher was the synchronization/charging cable. The Walkman connector is remarkably similar to the original iPod’s dock connector. It’s a wide, proprietary connector. I would have much preferred that Sony adopt a micro USB connection or a USB-C connector on the A17. There’s no alternative way to charge the Walkman without this cable. So be warned, even with the Sony’s truly amazing battery life, you should pick up an extra cable or two to have in hand.
I used the Sony Walkman with my Mac. Sony includes its own software package called, “Content Transfer.” Could there be a worse named application? The icon used to represent the app likewise looks more like an iPod than the Sony Walkman. There’s no ability to manage and play songs via the app nor can you create playlists or other such activities. Unlike iTunes or JRiver, the app is pretty much useless without the Walkman being plugged in. I would have much preferred a plugin sync option to an existing piece of software as opposed to this solution.
Gripes aside, the software does what it’s supposed to do: transfer songs to and from the Sony Walkman. The process worked flawlessly every time without any hiccup or problem. I could even set a watched folder on my Mac and have the app automatically transfer music from that watched folder.
As I mentioned earlier, the Walkman’s user interface leaves quite a bit to be desired. There isn’t anything necessarily wrong with it. It’s just simple, unremarkable, and pedestrian. The UI would be more at home in 2005 as opposed to 2015.
The A17’s buttons are clearly and cleanly laid out. I could easily manipulate the device without looking at it, which I find to be a real plus of tactile buttons. As commendable as the layout is, the overall interaction with the unit simply isn’t as elegant as an old fashioned iPod. If you’re looking for a work of art, this isn’t your device; but if you’re looking for something that’s functional and does what it says it’s supposed to do then you’ll be well-pleased with the Sony.
Listening TestsUnlike possibly any other product, Sony has put all its eggs in the Hi-Res Basket. If the A17 doesn’t deliver on its Hi-Res promise, then you’re far better off with your iPhone or Android mobile phone for listening to music.
At the most basic level, all a Hi-Res audio player needs to do is playback high resolution files. At a more detailed level, the core issue is whether or not that player can truly reproduce the dynamics, clarity, nuances, and realism that properly recorded and mastered Hi-Res music files can deliver. If the Sony can only do the former and not the latter then it’s not worth anyone’s attention.
I used the Sony A17 for four months. I loaded it primarily with Hi-Res music but also a handful of my favorite songs and artists in CD-quality. To start off my review period, I decided to work my way through the included Chesky Ultimate Headphone demo audio files. I’ve been familiar with Dr. Chesky’s recordings for many years and own one of his SACD recordings. Anything that Dr. Chesky touches is worth your serious attention.
As high a bar as I had with Dr. Chesky’s works, The Ultimate Headphone demo files simply blew me away. I’ve never—and I mean never—heard recordings like this through a pair of headphones. The opening high resolution track, “When the Saints Go Marching In” was so life-like through the Sony Walkman that I did one of those triple blinks and jerked my head back and forth in disbelief. Right there, on a firmly delineated soundstage with incredible width and depth were all the instruments. The instruments were clean, detailed, and delivered a life-like punch to them. With every high resolution music file the experience was the same. The instruments and the players came alive in an uncanny way. Playing the lower-resolution, compressed files sucked the life out of them. The analogy I can use is like listening to a symphony in the vestibule outside the main doors. You can hear the music just fine but once you open the doors and walk into the space, the music takes on a life of its own. Once you’re in the main performance hall, you can never go back outside. That’s what the experience was like with this album.
Next, I decided to do an additional experiment and see if the Sony could allow me to discern the differences of high resolution files in a pseudo-blind test experiment. I’ve previously written how I took the high resolution audio experiment setup by Dr. Mark Waldrep of AIX Records and Scott Wilkinson, editor of AVS Forum. You can read about the experiment in more detail here.
I listened to these three files through my review set of the Benchmark DAC2 digital to analog converter and preamp, AHB2 power amplifier, and Revel Ultima2 Salon full-range speakers. With that incredible setup, I felt as though I was easily able to discern the difference in the files and tell which ones were high resolution music.
![]() |
The AVS and AIX Records Hi-Res Test |
In case you’re wondering, I couldn’t look at the Sony player and tell which file was high resolution and which one wasn’t. Both versions came up with the HD logo on the Sony screen because of the way Mark Waldrep did the final export of the files. You’d also be correct in pointing out that I was potentially biased by listening to the Hi-Res music files through the Revel Salons and Benchmark combo. I readily admit that I found myself looking for some of the same cues I noticed when listening through the free standing setup. However, when I took the test and wrote this review, I was not privy to the real answer of which file was which. All I can tell you is that I came to exactly the same conclusions listening through the Sony equipment as I did with the Bechmark and Revel combo.
The first track I listened to from the AIX Records and AVS Forum high resolution music experiment was “Just my imagination.” What I perceived to be the high resolution version sounded more open. Cymbals had more sizzle and their decay was smooth, natural, and life-like. To try and relate what the difference sounded like between the files is like looking at ripples in a lake after you throw a rock in the water. I felt as though the high resolution file had an almost infinite number of fine ripples. In contrast, the CD-quality file felt like it had fewer and broader ripples without all the detail. Continuing that analogy, in both instances, the water still moves. But with the high resolution music file, you have both a greater number of fine waves and greater amplitude.
Listening to the CD-quality file had a constant veil. Drums lacked punch compared to the high res version. Indeed, at 4:23 and again at 4:25 there is a superb punch of the drum on the high resolution file that was flatter and not as involving on the low resolution version.
Next up was “Mosaic.” The warmth and depth of the guitar’s body was very similar between the two tracks through the Sony setup. Dynamics were perhaps slightly better with the version I perceived to be the high-resolution file, but it was really the high notes that led me to choose which file was which. On the high-resolution file, the strike of the triangle was, precise, and piercing. In particular, at approximately 1:42 into the track, it was very easy to tell the difference between the two versions. On what I perceived to be the CD-quality version, the triangle sounded more rounded and lacked the same sparkle.
The final track, “On the Street Where You Live,” the song’s big band dynamics were preserved with astonishingly life-like range in the file I perceived to be the high resolution version. What struck me was how delicate some of the notes came across even in such a dynamic ensemble. It made me stop and think that when listening to recorded music we fail to receive those beautiful, elegant cues that are such an assumed part of a live performance. To my ears, through the Sony Walkman and headphones, the compression present in the lower resolution version was evident. There was a duller, more two-dimensional sound. Switching to the high resolution track, I clearly felt that I perceived a smoother overall sound. Vocals were three dimensional and truer to life and once again, the high resolution version presented a more engaging sound. To top it off, the crescendo at the end of the song ends with the visceral impact of a kick drum that was just awesome on the high resolution version.
Finally, I played the 24bit/192kHz version of Saint-Saëns: Symphony No. 3 - Symphony in A Major - Le rouet d'Omphale. I had downloaded from Acoustic Sounds. This Naxos recording was simply sumptuous through the Sony Walkman and headphone combo. The timbre of violins was spot on. The overall presentation was spacious. And those glorious organ notes? They were deep, rich, and authoritative.
If you had any doubts about the Sony NWZ-A17 serving as the hub of your Hi-Res music, cast those doubts aside right now. The Sony NWZ-A17 Walkman Digital Music Player and MDR-1A headphones passed all of my Hi-Res music tests with flying colors.
Conclusion
The state of Hi-Res audio holds tremendous promise and at the same time so much confusion to both the audiophile and music lover alike. Because many (if not most) audio systems are incapable of reproducing the full benefits of Hi-Res music, many music lovers are left scratching their head in bewilderment and legitimately asking, “What’s the big deal about Hi-Res music? Is this some voodoo or another case of the Emperor’s new clothes?”I’m a firm believer that you need top notch equipment to hear the differences in properly recorded Hi-Res music. Until now, that meant spending thousands. For a hair under $600, the Sony NWZ-A17 Walkman Hi-Res Digital Music Player ($299.99) and MDR-1A Hi-Res headphones ($299.99) put all the major benefits of Hi-Res music within reach of mere mortals.
The NWZ-A17 Walkman and MDR-1A headphones are an unbelievable Hi-Res audio dynamic duo that brings out the sonic beauty and potential of Hi-Res music. I applaud Sony for thinking through the entire Hi-Res signal chain—from player to headphones—and delivering the audible goods.
Now it’s true that the Sony is neither the sexiest portable player on the market nor is it paired with the best complementary software. It also doesn’t support DSD audio files. But, those user-side gripes aside, the Sony combo is a supersonic powerhouse that has it where it counts most: size, weight, battery life, audio quality, and a price point that makes its competition green with envy.
So let me say it straight: if you are serious about getting the best quality audio from your current collection and maximizing the potential of Hi-Res audio, then look no further than the NWZ-A17 Walkman and MDR-1 headphones. Since the iPhone’s introduction in 2007, the Sony NWZ-A17 Walkman is the first device that has given me a legit reason to carry a dedicated music player once more. Highly recommended.